I don't presuppose that you don't know what you talk about. And I do read your posts.

It is from reading your posts that it is obvious -- to anyone with any detailed knowledge; ie. anyone who has ever written a program to use these techniques -- that you have no real understanding of them at all.

You may have perused the glossary and learnt a few keywords; scanned the management summary enough to gain a little context; and have sufficient English skills to dress them together with ``lot's'' "of" 'different' quotes and _s^t_y^l_i^s_tⁱ_c devices and some flowery analogies to fool the unknowing into a few up-votes, but it stands out like a sore thumb that there is no real understanding behind your words.

It is not just obvious from what you write; but also from the fact that you've never once posted any code in example of your pseudo-theoretical advices. And from the fact that you never counter argue the subject in support of your statements; but only attempt to distract with meta-discussion. And I am not the only one who can see it. I can only down-vote you once!

You Sir, are a wannabe. But you're either too old, or too lazy or too recalcitrant to actually to do any research -- much less actually write any programs -- and get a real understanding of that about which you pontificate. You're not even a has-been. More, a never-will-be.