Normally we only see those who should have searched prior to asking, and haven't. Thanks for reminding us that it is often the other way round, we just don't notice it.
| [reply] |
I am having similar experiences myself -- thanks from me too! | [reply] |
thanks perlmonks (closed) |
— 19,742 |
I am returning to Perl programming after too long of a break. With the information I found searching perlmonks, I was able to quickly figure out the problems I had with my Hash of Arrays. Than k-you to all of the kind monks who thoroughly answered the previous questions on this!
Genuinely Grateful - 30 seconds ago
|
| |
|
| |
9,367 |
What information did you find? You can't do a Hash of Arrays in Perl. Post your information. - Always First 29 seconds ago |
| |
|
| |
15,856 |
This isn't a free mind-reading service. Fix the tpyo. - Snidey 12 seconds ago |
| |
|
| |
7,204 |
Your meditation is way too vague. What does "quickly figure out the problems" mean? Can you show us a hex representation of that? Please read Exactly How To Think, you'll get more votes that way - Knowit All 10 seconds ago |
| |
| |
closed as not a real meditation by Always First, Knowit All, Snidey 2 seconds ago
This meditation is not a good fit to our format. It's difficult to tell what is being meditated upon here. This meditation is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical. We expect meditations to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this meditation will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ.
|
| [reply] |
Sucks being human, does it not?
Nevertheless: PerlMonks remains, at least for me, one of the very best all-around professional communities that I have ever encountered, anywhere and anytime, on the entire World-Wide Web.
Dunno if over the years I have personally contributed one damned thing to it... but, aye, I have tried.
| |