Sorry, but that simply cannot be true.
At least not for large ranges:
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$t=time; ++$c for 1..1e6; say time-
+$t; <>"
0.0741260051727295
5.2 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$e=1e6;$t=time; ++$c for 1..$e; say
+ time-$t; <>"
0.0663371086120605
5.3 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$t=time; ++$c for 1..1e7; say time-
+$t; <>"
0.635999917984009
5.2 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$e=1e7;$t=time; ++$c for 1..$e; say
+ time-$t; <>"
0.645999908447266
5.3 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$t=time; ++$c for 1..1e8; say time-
+$t; <>"
6.22199988365173
5.2 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$e=1e8;$t=time; ++$c for 1..$e; say
+ time-$t; <>"
6.46099996566772
5.3 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$t=time; ++$c for 1..1e9; say time-
+$t; <>"
61.9520001411438
5.2MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$e=1e9;$t=time; ++$c for 1..$e; say
+ time-$t; <>"
64.4389998912811
5.3 MB
There isn't any evidence for it at small range sizes: C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$t=time; ++$c for 1..1e2; say time-
+$t; <>"
2.09808349609375e-005
5.2 MB
C:\test>perl -MTime::HiRes=time -E"$e=1e2;$t=time; ++$c for 1..$e; say
+ time-$t; <>"
1.9073486328125e-005
5.3 MB
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
|