in reply to Re^10: Definition of numerically equal and rationale for 'you' == 'me'
in thread Definition of numerically equal and rationale for 'you' == 'me'
Exactly. That's what I meant with my last paragraph in Re^7: Definition of numerically equal and rationale for 'you' == 'me'. Without sigils, you have to be much more careful, about whether a term or an infix is expected, and errors are more likely to go unnoticed. So possible, but in general a bad idea.
|
|---|