Re^14: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

The curse of the trivial example. Would you agree that first is a lot easier on the eyes than the latter two?:

print "And the set contains [ { sort @a } ]\n";;
And the set contains [ brown dog fox jumps lazy over quick the the ]

printf "And the set contains [ %s ]\n", join ' ', sort @a;;
And the set contains [ brown dog fox jumps lazy over quick the the ]

print "And the set contains [ ", join( ' ', sort @a ), " ]\n";;
And the set contains [  brown dog fox jumps lazy over quick the the  ]
[download]

Even with the complication of the p5 syntax, it's still nicer to my eyes:

print "And the set contains [ @{[ sort @a ]} ]\n";;
And the set contains [ brown dog fox jumps lazy over quick the the ]
[download]

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^14: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references Select or Download Code