in reply to Re^10: Order of evaluation/interpolation of references (op order)
in thread Order of evaluation/interpolation of references

Wow. I saw ikegamis post 3 times, and it looked radically different all three times.

Current

<blockquote><p><i>Sorry, but that makes no sense in relation to what I + posted.</i></blockquote> <p>That's why I asked what you considered to be a bug. My guess: The l +ack of copying by operators causes other operators to behave differen +tly than you'd expect. <p>If you deliberately hide information, you only have yourself to bla +me for any ensuing confusion

Before that

<blockquote><p><i>Sorry, but that makes no sense in relation to what I + posted.</i></blockquote> <p>Then what you posted incorrectly assumes lvalue results only affect + concatenation.

Before that it was something equally grumpy about being confused, but not resembling the above two sentiments in any other way.