Thanks $code_or_die, didn't know that. Old saying "No read manual, no have clue".
That probably explains my sysadmins reluctance to install it!
I just worry about a broken method, he gets to worry about the
whole system.
I'm sure the problem just relates to a hand install but it seems odd
to have moved this particular code into a module to me, especially as it is important.
But then again, I have never found the coding style in CGI.pm all that transparent. I will
give it a day or two to see what gets added here and would like to
see for myself if you can generate a functional but broken CGI.pm 3.01 with a hand install
and a fully functional one with a regular install before I pester Lincoln.
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
|