in reply to Re^7: flip-flop flop
in thread flip-flop flop
I think I would want a way not to tie the flipflop to the "immediate" lexical scope, but to an enclosing scope n-levels up (so in my case tie it not to the anonymous sub, but the "blah-sub"-scope 1 level up.
But it's probably hard to find a good syntax for that - so good-bye flip-flop...
btw: Will there be a flip-flop in Perl 6?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^9: flip-flop flop
by moritz (Cardinal) on Mar 30, 2012 at 16:11 UTC |