in reply to Re^7: flip-flop flop
in thread flip-flop flop

Good point.

I think I would want a way not to tie the flipflop to the "immediate" lexical scope, but to an enclosing scope n-levels up (so in my case tie it not to the anonymous sub, but the "blah-sub"-scope 1 level up.

But it's probably hard to find a good syntax for that - so good-bye flip-flop...

btw: Will there be a flip-flop in Perl 6?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^9: flip-flop flop
by moritz (Cardinal) on Mar 30, 2012 at 16:11 UTC