Re^3: Multiple Combinatorics

Care to clarify that? Maybe add some examples? Cos like JavaFan, I don't get it.

As soon as you pick any two values from group 2 (1..6), you've also already picked two values from group 1 (0..7), so there is no way to comply with your "every resulting row should satisfy the initial condition" requirement.

You would either a) a pick two from both groups and therefore have 4 from the larger group; or b) pick nothing from the larger group, in which case you have nothing from the larger group.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^3: Multiple Combinatorics

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Multiple Combinatorics by aartist (Pilgrim) on Apr 15, 2012 at 22:01 UTC
Yes: if Group B (1..6) is subset of Group A(0..7) and Pick(B)=2 is equal to Pick(A)=2 then we apply 'b): pick nothing from larger group'; In this case, we still have picked 2 values from larger group automatically, which holds the initial condition. Only thing that '0' and '7' won't be picked at all in any resultset. ( from the given data).	[reply]
Re^5: Multiple Combinatorics by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Apr 17, 2012 at 03:06 UTC
The only way to deal with this efficiently is to reduce the input sets to non-overlapping sets prior to permuting them. To do that, you need to lay out the rules for overlapping sets. You'd need to define how to deal with: One set completely overlaps another; the overlap is less than the number to be picked from the smaller group. The overlap is less than the number to be picked from the larger group. The overlap is equal to the number to picked from the smaller group. ... There is only a partial overlap between the groups: The overlap is smaller than the number to be picked .... ... Whence you've defined how all the possibilities should be resolved into distinct groups, the rest should be relatively easy. I'm still bugged by your lack of explanation of what the purpose of this is? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]