in reply to DateTime::Format::Manip fails test script

I tried to use DateTime::Format::Manip ... I wonder someone at this monastery has some clue to this problem.

FWIW, Bug #55771 for DateTime-Format-DateManip: Failing since 2010-03-14 reveals Date::Manip is has changed while DateTime::Format::Manip hasn't kept up, so DateTime::Format::Manip needs a update to use the latest Date::Manip interface, apparently Date::Manip has improved significantly, so much of the cruft in DateTime::Format::Mani can be removed (that timezone stuff).

See Date::Manip::DM6

Not that I see why you'd use both :)

  • Comment on Re: DateTime::Format::Manip fails test script

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: DateTime::Format::Manip fails test script
by remiah (Hermit) on Apr 18, 2012 at 10:16 UTC

    Thanks for good links!!

    Not that I see why you'd use both :)

    Because, in coerce example of Moose (http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/LinuxMag/col95.html), the author of this article used DateTime::Format::DateManip. I was fascinated by this example and I would like to try this with replacing DateTime with Date::Manip.