in reply to Re^2: Perl Complains of Nested Quantifiers
in thread Perl Complains of Nested Quantifiers
FWIW the "possessive modifier" is simply syntactic sugar for (?>...) so (?>x+) should produce exactly the same optree as x++.
$ perl -Mre=debug -e'/x++/' Compiling REx "x++" Final program: 1: SUSPEND (8) 3: PLUS (6) 4: EXACT <x> (0) 6: SUCCEED (0) 7: TAIL (8) 8: END (0) anchored "x" at 0 (checking anchored) minlen 1 Freeing REx: "x++" $ perl -Mre=debug -e'/(?>x+)/' Compiling REx "(?>x+)" Final program: 1: SUSPEND (8) 3: PLUS (6) 4: EXACT <x> (0) 6: SUCCEED (0) 7: TAIL (8) 8: END (0) anchored "x" at 0 (checking anchored) minlen 1 Freeing REx: "(?>x+)"
so there is nothing stopping you using it in 5.8.8
|
|---|