in reply to Re^3: Bug in perl command line processing?
in thread Bug in perl command line processing?

Now you've missed the point twice.

FWIW, it works on Windows as well, with suitable quoting, of course.

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
  • Comment on Re^4: Bug in perl command line processing?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Bug in perl command line processing?
by Anonymous Monk on May 22, 2012 at 21:51 UTC

    Now you've missed the point twice.

    Nope. Even if this is a bug in perl, you're still dealing with a shell, so a SEE ALSO cannot possibly miss the point

      Even if this is a bug in perl, you're still dealing with a shell

      So, every time there is ever a bug with any unix command line program, you'll think it appropriate to link to some guide on shell quoting?

      wtf-ever.

      Anyone with enough clue to really understand and be interested by this in the first place, doesn't need a refresher on basics.

      Why have you chosen to post anonymously?

      Never mind. That's a rhetorical question.

      -sauoq
      "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

        So, every time there is ever a bug with any unix command line program, you'll think it appropriate to link to some guide on shell quoting?

        Yes, its a good starting point

        Anyone with enough clue to really understand and be interested by this in the first place, doesn't need a refresher on basics.

        Ah yes, simply chant "you're missing the point" and the knowledge is magically deposited in brain of all interested parties

        Why have you chosen to post anonymously? Never mind. That's a rhetorical question.

        I like abuse