Re^27: Native newline encoding

And once again your misunderstanding is manifest. You've quoted from a section that has nothing to do with the discussion.

The section you've quoted from relates to how to resolve dealing with the required 8-bit data stream on 9-bit byte/32-bit word machines -- long extinct.

The section you should be reading is 3.1.1

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

The start of some sanity?

Comment on Re^27: Native newline encoding

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^28: Native newline encoding by sauoq (Abbot) on May 29, 2012 at 21:27 UTC
You've quoted from a section that has nothing to do with the discussion. . . . The section you should be reading is 3.1.1 Is this some isolated sloppiness or are you really this ~~incompetent~~ thick? That quote was from 3.1, of which 3.1.1 is a subsection, of course. `-sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";`	[reply]