Re^5: Calling a radio button to the second cgi script

My hosting server logs include all the parameter lists in the requested URLs by default. It doesn't take that much space.

Update: The default apache install on OS X will also show the parameter list in the log if you change the POST to a GET. You don't want to leave it that way, but it can be useful for debugging. It indeed sends only one word values, as pointed out in several replies now.

Comment on Re^5: Calling a radio button to the second cgi script

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Calling a radio button to the second cgi script by Anonymous Monk on Jun 12, 2012 at 08:25 UTC
My hosting server logs include all the parameter lists in the requested URLs by default. It doesn't take that much space. Update: The default apache install on OS X will also show the parameter list in the log if you change the POST to a GET. You don't want to leave it that way, but it can be useful for debugging. It indeed sends only one word values, as pointed out in several replies now. Sounds like a lot of wasted physical and mental effort The OP has perl cgi program that compiles and runs -- time to stop fooling around with webserver configuration and logfiles and start debugging the application. Simply call DebugCGI and read the webpage	[reply]
Re^7: Calling a radio button to the second cgi script by bitingduck (Deacon) on Jun 12, 2012 at 15:20 UTC
`tail -f /var/log/apache2/access_log` [download] And you can watch what the webserver is receiving. Hardly effort, and often useful.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^8: Calling a radio button to the second cgi script by Anonymous Monk on Jun 12, 2012 at 15:43 UTC
tail -f /var/log/apache2/access_log And you can watch what the webserver is receiving. Hardly effort, and often useful. Not really assumes a shell assumes aforementioned changes to html file assumes aforementioned changes to cgi file requires a human to interpret raw URLs with his mind If OP was able to do all this when you suggested it, then the OP wouldn't need help debugging this Basically its bad advice.	[reply]