Re^2: Not so trivial question

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Not so trivial question by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 12, 2012 at 15:07 UTC
I've had success with pp on various platforms. I've never used cava or PDK. Perl2Exe is also available but it's terrible IMHO.	[reply]
Re^4: Not so trivial question by heatblazer (Scribe) on Jun 13, 2012 at 06:51 UTC
Have to confirm your useful reply - just tested pp installed from CPAN and I have the build binary! I`ll do the speed check right away! Consider this solved	[reply]
Re^4: Not so trivial question by heatblazer (Scribe) on Jun 13, 2012 at 08:14 UTC
I had an error in running builds form pp THe error most of my friends reported is: `"envpring" is not recognized as an internal or external command operable program or batch file` [download] Other reeport was: `C:\Users\cdpetro>C:\Users\cdpetro\Desktop\envprint.exe Program too big to fit in memory` [download] A plain question: can I make a windows executable from my linux distro using pp and a perl script?	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Not so trivial question by Corion (Patriarch) on Jun 13, 2012 at 08:26 UTC
I think what Anonymous Monk wants to tell you is that you will need to provide more information about your problem. Interesting points would be: What command line do you use to create your executable? How does your executable "not work on Windows"? The exact error message and/or symptoms are important. Can you produce and post a small (10 to 20 line) example script that exhibits the same symptoms, so we can easily replicate your problem?	[reply]
Re^5: Not so trivial question by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 13, 2012 at 08:30 UTC
Again you've failed to actually ask a question that anyone can reply to with anything other than truisms on how to actually ask questions. How do I post a question effectively?. Update: Before badly editing the post in question read: I am just wondering, my binaries does not work on windows... Is there something more specific that I am missing?	[reply]
Re^5: Not so trivial question by marto (Cardinal) on Jun 13, 2012 at 09:14 UTC
It's nice to see that even when you update your post (removing what you previously asked), you still manage to ignore the advice given in the existing replies. In future when editing posts please don't remove the content as can make replies somewhat redundant.	[reply]
Re^5: Not so trivial question by Anonymous Monk on Jun 13, 2012 at 08:21 UTC
Yes, a real question	[reply]