in reply to Re^2: defined ? to be : not
in thread defined ? to be : not

I must admit I'd be more comfortable with "my protagonist". I'm quite possessive of Hamlet, but was willing to at least share him.

The hostname for my previous desktop machine is ophelia; the current one is ophelia2. My laptop is miranda (from The Tempest).

perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: defined ? to be : not
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 12, 2012 at 19:07 UTC
    My computers are named "Birgit", "Legba" and "Ghede"; on some forums I am known as "Baron Samedi" and even "Count Zero" fits within this pattern.

    CountZero

    A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

    My blog: Imperial Deltronics