in reply to Re: Sharing Hash Question
in thread Sharing Hash Question

Likely referring to threads::shared

edit: I especially like the part where I get down-voted for wanting to be helpful to a first-time PM poster instead of being a dick.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Sharing Hash Question
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 04, 2012 at 20:19 UTC

    No shit Sherlock! :)

    But the point is, if he hasn't spelt the name correctly, how could his code work? How could he be getting the error message he claims? Etc.

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    The start of some sanity?
[reply]
      Hey, I feel you, but no need to take it out on me! I just don't want the next person to come along and read that such a module doesn't exist and take it as fact.

      Also, I think it is more constructive to point the OP to the appropriate docs for Posting on PerlMonks instead of flogging him/her.

[reply]

        ++ on the doc links, but I have to say it seems likely to be wasted effort considering the tone of the entire OP.

[reply]
        but no need to take it out on me!

        I wasn't. (Didn't you see the smiley?)

        You raised a point, I responded to it.

        With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

        The start of some sanity?
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom