Re^2: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 06, 2012 at 19:20 UTC
Why? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^4: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user by Anonymous Monk on Jul 06, 2012 at 19:55 UTC
Re^2: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user, obviously	[reply]
Re^5: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 06, 2012 at 22:14 UTC
That's what; not why. Those modules exist and serve useful purposes; but just as I do not use high-pressure autoclaves, ultrasonic debriders or anti-bacterial soaps to clean my car; there is simply no good reason for using those modules for this purpose. So your terse suggestions and laconic style amount to nothing more than insecurity and bluster. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^6: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user by Anonymous Monk on Jul 07, 2012 at 04:39 UTC
Re^7: Security issue and solution for terminal command accessed by public user by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 07, 2012 at 05:46 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here