in reply to Re: random pairs
in thread random pairs

I understood that the second element of each pair was to be a random number between 0 and 99. I did not read in the specs that there should be no repeats.

Also it is very well possible that your method yields a combination, the reverse of which is also in the set. Suppose your shuffle yields the list 99 to 0. In that case, every result's reverse is in the set.

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

My blog: Imperial Deltronics