Re^2: 0==undef, that's annoying. Is it?

These work, but I don't like either of them (i'm being a bit too perfectionist there).

The first one is not clear, it's a lot too complex to read, for such a simple assertion. The second one is exactly equivalent to my

is($score, 0)
[download]

assertion, but just harder to read.
And i still prefer using cmp_ok() for numbers, as '==' indicates clearly that it's numbers. And

is('1','1.0')
[download]

returns 0, while

cmp(1, '==', 1.0)
[download]

is true.
So... I'd like to use cmp_ok() for numbers, but i'll have to be careful to not compare zeros in there.

Comment on Re^2: 0==undef, that's annoying. Is it? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: 0==undef, that's annoying. Is it? by AnomalousMonk (Archbishop) on Jul 15, 2012 at 23:11 UTC
Perhaps another alternative to consider is Test::NoWarnings. `>perl -wMstrict -le "use Test::More 'no_plan'; use Test::NoWarnings; ;; cmp_ok(0, '==', undef, 'is 0 really undefined?'); " ok 1 - is 0 really undefined? not ok 2 - no warnings # Failed test 'no warnings' # at C:/strawberry/5.14/perl/vendor/lib/Test/NoWarnings.pm line 38. # There were 1 warning(s) # (lots and lots of discussion about the warning elided) # 1..2 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2.` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: 0==undef, that's annoying. Is it? by Anonymous Monk on Jul 15, 2012 at 23:33 UTC
These work, but I don't like either of them (i'm being a bit too perfectionist there). :) No, not perfectionist, merely neurotic (overanxious) :) See, the language is what it is, learn its ways and go with the flow :) don't get annoyed at things outside of your control, control yourself :) serenity now	[reply]