First is that all my text is an object (I can hear tye groaning already).

Seems you might be better served to pay more attention to things I actually say and to pay less attention to noises that you imagine I make. Or perhaps to keep your misinformed imaginings about my opinions to yourself.

I've frequently argued in favor of using objects and classes. There are particular subtechniques of OO that I have frequently argued against. But each of those are quite explicitly about how to avoid doing OO badly, not about avoiding doing OO. So I find it hard to imagine how little attention you must have paid in order to form such an incorrect impression of what I was arguing. Or, why you feel it wise to throw in such a comment about something that you have so effectively ignored the substance of.

Or perhaps making off-hand comments attributing opinions quite opposite to ones I've frequently expressed is something you think qualifies as humor? If so, I guess you presume that my opinions are so widely known that readers will realize the absurdity of your claim and chuckle?

I don't presume such fame and find it tiring to have to defend my beliefs, especially in such an off-topic manner that will surely be widely interpreted as a downer.

I would appreciate it if you would refrain from commenting on your interpretations of my beliefs in unrelated writings. Even if your interpretations had not been so incorrect, I would still likely have found it rude to be brought in as a side show in an aside. Thank you.