in reply to Re^3: Creating Standalone Win32 Executable
in thread Creating Standalone Win32 Executable

Have you even read the docs?

Have you?

No need to gang-up on the newbie, I think i was doing fine by myself ::)

perl514.dll shouldn't be missing, its integral to par/pp, it should get packed each time, so -l option shouldn't be used for perl514.dll

  • Comment on Re^4: Creating Standalone Win32 Executable

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Creating Standalone Win32 Executable
by zentara (Cardinal) on Jul 20, 2012 at 13:33 UTC
    Have you?

    Yeah, I read as far down into the list of options, as I needed to, to get that option, then reported back. But now in another node, he said he tried that, and even that option dosn't work. Just what the heck is it with that pp program anyways? Are self-contained programs really better than just having decent Perl installation to begin with? How come people have so much trouble with it? Dosn't it seem that it will likely be full of problems on the target machines, especially if the create machines has problems even creating it?

    Sometimes I think perlmonks has become a test bed for psychological testing. ..oO(hhmmmm, I wonder) :-)


    I'm not really a human, but I play one on earth.
    Old Perl Programmer Haiku ................... flash japh