in reply to Re: Moose::Util::TypeConstraints - Querying subtype() Caveat
in thread Moose::Util::TypeConstraints - Querying subtype() Caveat

Thanks for your response.

It sounds like you also think this could be a documentation error. Thanks for digging up the original doco: I wouldn't necessarily assume a misunderstanding, it could simply be a typo.

Re "See 2001 ...": unless you're merely indicating that indirect object syntax has been misunderstood for a long time, the significance of the 2001 links eludes me. (The 3rd link is actually 2000, if that's important.) The eariest version of Moose on CPAN (Moose 0.10), referenced in your second paragraph, is dated 05 Jul 2006.

-- Ken

  • Comment on Re^2: Moose::Util::TypeConstraints - Querying subtype() Caveat

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Moose::Util::TypeConstraints - Querying subtype() Caveat
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 28, 2012 at 09:09 UTC

    Re "See 2001 ..." ... the significance of the 2001 links eludes me.

    Well, it was just link to explain about indirect object pitfall for anyone interested, the "2001" isn't important, I just found it curious, and it slipped into my post :)