Re^4: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp

Ah, it's so blindingly obvious when you point it out, thanks for this. Of course I'm doing exactly what your first example shows, but not for long.

Comment on Re^4: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init? (no reuse no run run ) by Anonymous Monk on Sep 08, 2013 at 21:04 UTC
Well, apparently, (I guesstimate) since (some time around) CGI::Application 3.x it is no longer recommended to reuse CGI::Application objects, no longer recommended to call run repeatedly, as Bug #72909 for CGI-Application: persistence issues says CGI::Application is designed to have a new object created on each request. which is an assumption various ::Plugins and extensions make, so its best to play along and not reuse an object and not ->run ->run ->run You probably discovered this on your own :)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: In CGI::Application cgiapp_prerun vs. cgiapp_init? (no reuse no run run )
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 08, 2013 at 21:04 UTC

Well, apparently, (I guesstimate) since (some time around) CGI::Application 3.x it is no longer recommended to reuse CGI::Application objects, no longer recommended to call run repeatedly, as Bug #72909 for CGI-Application: persistence issues says CGI::Application is designed to have a new object created on each request. which is an assumption various ::Plugins and extensions make, so its best to play along and not reuse an object and not ->run ->run ->run

You probably discovered this on your own :)

[reply]