in reply to Re^2: checksum of subroutine
in thread checksum of subroutine
"A hacker can replace needed bits in a file, then add other bits so that the overall file checksum stays valid."
True, but it's very, very hard. And would be made exponentially harder -- effectively impossible -- by taking two checksums of the file using different algorithms. For example taking both a SHA-512 and Whirlpool hash of the file, then concatenating them.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^4: checksum of subroutine
by mnooning (Beadle) on Aug 13, 2012 at 16:53 UTC |