in reply to Re^2: Net::SMTP undef weirdness
in thread Net::SMTP undef weirdness

OK, I take that back. Sorry - your reply seemed narky.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Net::SMTP undef weirdness
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 28, 2012 at 07:48 UTC

    OK, I take that back. Sorry - your reply seemed narky.

    Its all good :) all self-evident truths seem snarky when stated -- I should have been more explicit/specific about which call failed

    The Basic debugging checklist says 7. Check the return (error) status of your commands , the same goes for methods, including constructors :)

    Though in all honesty, I was feeling snarky that day :)