Re^4: how to use the values of the first hash to be the keys for the second hash

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: how to use the values of the first hash to be the keys for the second hash by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 10, 2012 at 04:47 UTC
You included the `use Data::Dump qw[ pp ];` from my code into yours; but then you threw away the `pp \%newhash;` which I used to produce the output: `C:\test>junk { key1 => "val5,val6,val7,val8,val9", key2 => "val3" }` [download] If, after populating your two hashes: `%h1` & `%h2`, you used the same tool to dump them to the screen before trying to use them: `pp \%h1; pp \%h2;` [download] You could check whether you have populated them correctly. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. RIP Neil Armstrong div	[reply] [d/l] [select]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

You included the use Data::Dump qw[ pp ]; from my code into yours;

but then you threw away the pp \%newhash; which I used to produce the output:

C:\test>junk
 { key1 => "val5,val6,val7,val8,val9", key2 => "val3" }
[download]

If, after populating your two hashes: %h1 & %h2, you used the same tool to dump them to the screen before trying to use them:

pp \%h1;
pp \%h2;
[download]

You could check whether you have populated them correctly.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.