Re^7: Scope::Upper localize?

-- Consider tobyink's answer,

I am. And I'll respond to *him* when I have.

-- Even you? If you weren't going to answer Lotus1 question , why join in?

I haven't reponded to *him*. He was at least trying to help.

But gumptionless me-toos like you need to be shut down. You are the most annoying part of sites like this. Unfortunately, your kind pop up everwhere.

Comment on Re^7: Scope::Upper localize?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Scope::Upper localize? by Anonymous Monk on Sep 11, 2012 at 00:43 UTC
I haven't reponded to him. He was at least trying to help. You might be surprised, but me-too. I was considering if it would be worth it to spend half an hour composing a more detailed answer, and what level of detail would be required. But gumptionless me-toos like you need to be shut down. You are the most annoying part of sites like this. Unfortunately, your kind pop up everwhere. shut down? That can never work. If you think I am a troll, then Do Not Feed the Trolls!!!	[reply]
Re^9: Scope::Upper localize? by Anonymous Monk on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:10 UTC
-- I was considering ... composing a more detailed answer, I was considering entering the decathon, but I'm not capable of that either.	[reply]
Re^10: Scope::Upper localize? by Anonymous Monk on Sep 11, 2012 at 01:28 UTC
- I was considering ... composing a more detailed answer, I was considering entering the decathon, but I'm not capable of that either. But you're all up for violating encapsulation? Sure, example inside	[reply]