in reply to soap?

Although, as jepri points out, bikeNomad is a good answer the leap that he ( jepri ) makes from good to right is at best subjective and at worse premature.

It is very true that SOAP::Lite is a great implementation of SOAP but it may be premature if you haven't first researched SOAP itself.

Here is a list of URL's that may help:

Hope this helps.

mitd-Made in the Dark
'My favourite colour appears to be grey.'

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re:(jepri) soap?
by jepri (Parson) on Jul 25, 2001 at 08:46 UTC
    Sure it's subjective, but I'm having trouble thinking of circumstances where SOAP is not a good idea. the only one I can really think of is low bandwidth/low memory situations, where the overheads for HTTP and the processing time for the transport stuff becomes significant.

    So if you are implementing a XML RPC server on your Palm I agree SOAP is wrong. Other than that, I can't really see a reason not to use it.

    OK, one just occured - doing callbacks is not the easiest trick, but is trivial to work around.

    ____________________
    Jeremy
    I didn't believe in evil until I dated it.

      Nerd Critters!

      My point is that you are correct! But jettero just isn't in the space to accept you opinion yet. To get there he needs to understand what SOAP can do for him. Then he can accept SOAP::Lite as a great perlish way to enter the fray.

      mitd-Made in the Dark
      'My favourite colour appears to be grey.'