As to "missing )", I meant (but put it poorly) in your statement:
Surely trying to match \s* is futile in a negative-lookup? Because \s* can match nothing it will always succeed, thereby never matching??The assertion wasn't \s*, it was \s*\(, a horse of a completely different color.
In reply to Re^4: Negative Lookahead Assertion Problem
by ysth
in thread Negative Lookahead Assertion Problem
by Limbic~Region
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |