I disagree, but what's a real science anyway?

--> XKCD Purity

> It's probably the only field where self-taught people exceed in talent most CS graduates.

hng ... I have to work everyday with self-taught people and it drives me crazy to repeat things like "running your code twice successfully in the debugger doesn't qualify as testing"

OTOH .... the objective of university studies is to produce scientists not programmers.

But most jobs don't require scientists but engineers.

And those workplaces which are heavy on the theoretical side tend to hire mathematicians or physicists for their analytical skills.

True what you say, after all, HTML was invented by a physicist-turn-CS and look at the carnage and the body count it left behind ;)

And I have to admit that I do not prefer to work with self-taught people but I think my observation stands, although it really is subjective and borders hyperbole.

the objective of university studies is to produce scientists

maybe in the 70's. Now neither students nor governments, nor companies can afford producing scientists - it seems. Not even programmers it seems also.

Anyway, I hope YourMother manages the change successfully.

Common sense is the most fairly distributed thing in the world, for each one thinks he is so well-endowed with it that even those who are hardest to satisfy in all other matters are not in the habit of desiring more of it than they already have.

--- René Descartes

;-P

Anyway, we already agreed that a diploma in CS doesn't make you a scientist nor a programmer.

You might wanna have a look at the ways me and others handled this problem:

Re: Google Code Jam 2019 Round 1A Problem 1: Pylons

While I produced a formal proof for all possible solution (using techniques I learned at university), others "solved" it much quicker with a a mix of brute force and random generators.

It really depends, what you need to invest for which outcome.

BTW: I learned programing with 14, long before entering university.

update

other example: Re: Check randomly generated numbers have not been used before

This particular poster ignored the "Birthday paradox",

• I produced the exact formula I learned at school,
• others tried it out to prove him wrong.
again depends what you need.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice}