Re^3: RFC: pragma pragmatic

Given that I attempt to write all of my code to 5.8 compatibility

I never use feature, but I can't live without defined-Or (//), so 5.10 is a prerequisite for anything I right. There was a defined-or patch for 5.8 for anyone still stuck there.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". The enemy of (IT) success is complexity.

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. Suck that fhit

Comment on Re^3: RFC: pragma pragmatic

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: RFC: pragma pragmatic by stevieb (Canon) on Aug 11, 2017 at 20:53 UTC
If there was one feature from 5.10 that I'd use that tipped me over the edge to comply with 5.10+ in my code, it'd be defined-or. In fact, at least two of my distributions that I've had to bump up to 5.10 from 5.8 was due to defined-or being used in a required non-core module.	[reply]