Recently Active Threads

Viewing Nodes As of:	<<<<	<<<	<<	<	2000-07-09	>	>>	>>>	>>>>

+/-Legend (Top)

Title [^1](AC:3/9/7)+/- [author]

Means: You "^"=up- or "v"=down-voted, "1"=reputation; "AC" from ( Front-paged, Approved, Unapproved, Considered, or link to Parent or Root ); Replies: "3" direct, "9" descendents, "7" recent, "+/-" shows/hides(uses javascript)

View Full Documentation, Show Legend at Bottom

+/-Quests (Top)

Reviews Quest (7/14/7)+/- 2000-07-07 00:57 26 years ago

[vroom]
- RE: Reviews Quest (1)+/- 2000-07-07 06:39 26 years ago
  
  [BigJoe]
  - RE: RE: Reviews Quest 2000-07-11 02:27 26 years ago
    
    [BigJoe]
- RE: Reviews Quest (1)+/- 2000-07-07 19:42 26 years ago
  
  [Ovid]
  - RE: RE: Reviews Quest 2000-07-07 20:14 26 years ago
    
    [spectre]
- RE: Reviews Quest 2000-07-08 01:28 26 years ago
  
  [ivory]
- RE: Reviews Quest 2000-07-08 01:43 26 years ago
  
  [CMonster]
- (zdog) RE: Reviews Quest 2000-07-08 09:44 26 years ago
  
  [zdog]
- CGI::Carp (2/5)+/- 2000-07-08 21:10 26 years ago
  
  [SuperCruncher]
  - RE: CGI::Carp 2000-07-08 21:33 26 years ago
    
    [Ovid]
  - RE: CGI::Carp (use warnings?) (1/3)+/- 2000-07-08 22:26 26 years ago
    
    [ybiC]
    - RE: RE: CGI::Carp (2)+/- 2000-07-08 22:48 26 years ago
      
      [lhoward]
      - RE: RE: RE: CGI::Carp 2000-07-09 01:15 26 years ago
        
        [SuperCruncher]
      - RE: RE: RE: CGI::Carp 2000-07-09 01:31 26 years ago
        
        [SuperCruncher]
- Re: Reviews Quest 2001-01-20 22:47 25 years ago
  
  [deprecated]

+/-PerlMonks Discussion (Top)

Higher level posts (A:9/24/1)+/- 2000-07-07 17:18 26 years ago

[jjhorner]
- RE: Higher level posts (2/6)+/- 2000-07-07 17:38 26 years ago
  
  [flyfishin]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-07 17:55 26 years ago
    
    [splinky]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts (1/4)+/- 2000-07-07 18:19 26 years ago
    
    [c-era]
    - RE: RE: RE: Higher level posts (2/3)+/- 2000-07-07 20:14 26 years ago
      
      [flyfishin]
      - RE: RE: RE: RE: Higher level posts (1)+/- 2000-07-07 23:30 26 years ago
        
        [c-era]
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-07 23:55 26 years ago
        
        [Ozymandias]
      - RE: RE: RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-31 12:56 26 years ago
        
        [ivory]
- RE: Higher level posts (1)+/- 2000-07-07 17:45 26 years ago
  
  [gaggio]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-31 12:58 26 years ago
    
    [ivory]
- RE: Higher level posts - XP Growth problem 2000-07-07 18:00 26 years ago
  
  [lhoward]
- RE: Higher level posts (kudra: exp escalation, not unqualified monks) (2/4)+/- 2000-07-07 18:16 26 years ago
  
  [kudra]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts (1/2)+/- 2000-07-07 18:35 26 years ago
    
    [jjhorner]
    - RE: (3) Higher level posts (Thesis, not XP overhaul) (1)+/- 2000-07-07 23:20 26 years ago
      
      [ybiC]
      - RE: Thesis, not XP overhaul 2000-07-08 00:49 26 years ago
        
        [PipTigger]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-08 01:16 26 years ago
    
    [PipTigger]
- RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-07 18:36 26 years ago
  
  [BigJoe]
- RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-07 18:40 26 years ago
  
  [Aighearach]
- RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-07 19:09 26 years ago
  
  [Shendal]
- RE: Higher level posts (2/1)+/- 2000-07-07 19:59 26 years ago
  
  [gaggio]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-08 01:40 26 years ago
    
    [PipTigger]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts (kudra: con: max votes per post, neutral: vote weight by level as % chance) 2000-07-09 01:22 26 years ago
    
    [kudra]
- RE: Higher level posts (1/2)+/- 2000-07-08 03:20 26 years ago
  
  [Apterigo]
  - RE: RE: Higher level posts 2000-07-09 12:23 26 years ago
    
    [toadi]

+/-Questions (Top)

Untainting URLs and their descriptions [13](A:2/1)+/- 2000-07-08 22:43 26 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Untainting URLs and their descriptions 2000-07-08 22:53 26 years ago
  
  [lhoward]
- Security Risk [14] 2000-07-09 11:23 26 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
or or (A:5/10/9)+/- 2000-07-08 15:22 26 years ago

[ybiC]
- RE: or or (should be: or or ||) 2000-07-08 15:28 26 years ago
  
  [ybiC]
- RE: or or 2000-07-08 15:48 26 years ago
  
  [reptile]
- Re: or or (1/3/2)+/- 2000-07-08 15:53 26 years ago
  
  [ahunter]
  - RE: Re: or or (1/2/1)+/- 2000-07-09 00:51 26 years ago
    
    [Aighearach]
    - RE: RE: Re: or or (1)+/- 2000-07-09 01:57 26 years ago
      
      [ahunter]
      - RE: RE: RE: Re: or or 2000-07-09 08:49 26 years ago
        
        [Aighearach]
- RE: or or (or generally better for die) 2000-07-08 16:34 26 years ago
  
  [ybiC]
- Grouping Symbols? (2)+/- 2000-07-08 18:52 26 years ago
  
  [Kozz]
  - RE: Grouping Symbols? 2000-07-08 19:14 26 years ago
    
    [reptile]
  - RE: Grouping Symbols? 2000-07-08 21:23 26 years ago
    
    [ahunter]
loading (A:4)+/- 2000-07-08 06:14 26 years ago

[elusion]
- Re: loading 2000-07-08 06:17 26 years ago
  
  [Ozymandias]
- Re: loading 2000-07-08 07:37 26 years ago
  
  [jjhorner]
- Re: loading 2000-07-08 07:55 26 years ago
  
  [btrott]
- (jcwren) RE: loading 2000-07-08 17:11 26 years ago
  
  [jcwren]
setuid scripts, how? (A:3/13/7)+/- 2000-07-08 03:02 26 years ago

[norm]
- Re: setuid scripts (2/9/6)+/- 2000-07-08 03:14 26 years ago
  
  [cleen]
  - RE: Re: setuid scripts (1/5)+/- 2000-07-08 04:01 26 years ago
    
    [norm]
    - RE: RE: Re: setuid scripts (1/4)+/- 2000-07-08 04:07 26 years ago
      
      [cleen]
      - RE: RE: RE: Re: setuid scripts (1/3)+/- 2000-07-08 11:52 26 years ago
        
        [le]
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: setuid scripts (1/2)+/- 2000-07-08 12:06 26 years ago
        
        [cleen]
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: setuid scripts (1)+/- 2000-07-08 12:52 26 years ago
        
        [le]
        
        RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: setuid scripts 2000-07-08 12:58 26 years ago
        
        [cleen]
  - RE: Re: setuid scripts [3](1/2)+/- 2000-07-27 00:48 26 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
    - Win32 Net::Ping("icmp") -- RE: setuid scripts (1)+/- 2000-07-27 01:21 26 years ago
      
      [tye]
      - RE: Win32 Net::Ping("icmp") [4] 2000-07-27 17:42 26 years ago
        
        [Anonymous Monk]
- RE: setuid scripts, how? [9](1)+/- 2000-07-08 04:27 26 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - RE: RE: setuid scripts, how? 2000-07-27 01:10 26 years ago
    
    [tye]
- Re: setuid scripts [2] 2000-07-09 20:07 26 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
Fork() does not work with win32::ODBC connections [1](U:3/1)+/- 2000-07-08 01:03 26 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: Fork() does not work with win32::ODBC connections 2000-07-08 01:10 26 years ago
  
  [Shendal]
- Re: Fork() does not work with win32::ODBC connections 2000-07-08 13:08 26 years ago
  
  [Corion]
- RE: Without fork() print to not the NS does not work. 2000-07-11 05:01 26 years ago
  
  [jcwren]
timethese, and pushing array values (A:2/8/3)+/- 2000-07-08 00:26 26 years ago

[husker]
- RE: timethese, and pushing array values 2000-07-08 00:31 26 years ago
  
  [Adam]
- Re: timethese (1/6/3)+/- 2000-07-08 00:31 26 years ago
  
  [btrott]
  - RE: Re: timethese (1/5/3)+/- 2000-07-08 00:58 26 years ago
    
    [husker]
    - Magic state resets (2/4/2)+/- 2000-07-08 10:34 26 years ago
      
      [gryng]
      - RE: Magic state resets (1)+/- 2000-07-08 16:59 26 years ago
        
        [lhoward]
        
        Magic state resets aka Init Code 2000-07-08 18:05 26 years ago
        
        [gryng]
      - RE: Magic state resets (1)+/- 2000-07-11 19:13 26 years ago
        
        [husker]
        
        "Magic" state resets 2000-07-13 01:54 26 years ago
        
        [gryng]
in function? [7](A:4/5/1)+/- 2000-07-07 23:56 26 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: in function? (1)+/- 2000-07-08 00:01 26 years ago
  
  [ferrency]
  - RE: Re: in function? 2000-07-08 15:35 26 years ago
    
    [SuperCruncher]
- Re: in function? 2000-07-08 00:03 26 years ago
  
  [le]
- Re: in function? 2000-07-08 00:08 26 years ago
  
  [plaid]
- Re: in function? 2000-07-08 00:17 26 years ago
  
  [ZZamboni]
How can I get information about the user's browser? [5](U:6/1)+/- 2000-07-07 22:48 26 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- Re: How can I get information about the user's browser? 2000-07-08 03:44 26 years ago
  
  [nardo]
- Re: How can I get information about the user's browser? 2000-07-08 15:07 26 years ago
  
  [cleen]
- Re: How can I get information about the user's browser? 2000-08-22 01:16 26 years ago
  
  [wardk]
- Re: How can I get information about the user's browser? 2000-08-22 05:43 26 years ago
  
  [ybiC]
- Re: How can I get information about the user's browser? 2000-08-27 12:48 26 years ago
  
  [sinan]
- Re: How can I get information about the user's browser? 2001-11-17 16:12 25 years ago
  
  [hacker]
.ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? (A:6/9/1)+/- 2000-07-07 19:21 26 years ago

[mrmick]
- Re: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? (1)+/- 2000-07-07 19:35 26 years ago
  
  [c-era]
  - RE: Re: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? 2000-07-07 21:01 26 years ago
    
    [buzzcutbuddha]
- Re: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? 2000-07-07 19:36 26 years ago
  
  [merlyn]
- Re: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? 2000-07-07 19:59 26 years ago
  
  [lolindrath]
- Re: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? 2000-07-07 20:41 26 years ago
  
  [Ovid]
- RE: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? (1/2)+/- 2000-07-07 21:34 26 years ago
  
  [BigJoe]
  - Re: RE: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? (1)+/- 2001-04-27 19:06 25 years ago
    
    [Buckaroo Buddha]
    - Re: Re: RE: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? 2001-04-27 20:37 25 years ago
      
      [BigJoe]
- RE: .ASP vs .CGI - could someone clarify this? 2000-07-08 14:21 26 years ago
  
  [t0mas]

+/-Meditations (Top)

Me and a camel called Perl (A) 2000-07-09 00:42 26 years ago

[le]
foo bar and baz! (A:8/12/3)+/- 2000-04-26 22:31 26 years ago

[BBQ]
- RE: foo bar and baz! (2)+/- 2000-04-26 22:37 26 years ago
  
  [btrott]
  - RE: RE: foo bar and baz! 2000-04-26 22:58 26 years ago
    
    [BBQ]
  - RE: RE: foo bar and baz! [0] 2000-05-16 00:00 26 years ago
    
    [Anonymous Monk]
- RE: foo bar and baz! (1/2)+/- 2000-04-27 12:38 26 years ago
  
  [wonko]
  - RE: RE: foo bar and baz! (1)+/- 2000-04-28 00:43 26 years ago
    
    [Adam]
    - RE: RE: RE: foo bar and baz! 2000-04-28 10:48 26 years ago
      
      [wonko]
- RE: foo bar and baz! 2000-04-27 20:53 26 years ago
  
  [cciulla]
- RE: foo bar and baz! [4] 2000-05-21 00:00 26 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
- RE: foo bar and baz! 2000-07-08 11:54 26 years ago
  
  [redmist]
- RE: foo bar and baz! 2000-07-08 16:46 26 years ago
  
  [lhoward]
- RE: foo bar and baz! (ftp operation over big address records) 2000-07-08 17:14 26 years ago
  
  [ybiC]
- Re: foo bar and baz! 2023-08-04 12:51 3 years ago
  
  [eyepopslikeamosquito]

+/-Craft (Top)

Using ucd-snmpd's passthrough option 2000-07-08 09:42 26 years ago

[cleen]

+/-Perl Poems (Top)

love.pl [14](A:2/1)+/- 2000-07-07 17:44 26 years ago

[Anonymous Monk]
- RE: love.pl 2000-07-07 21:21 26 years ago
  
  [cleen]
- RE: love.pl 2000-07-08 07:24 26 years ago
  
  [mcwee]

+/-Book Reviews (Top)

Mastering Algorithms with Perl 2000-07-09 01:38 26 years ago

[splinky]
Mastering Regular Expressions 2000-07-09 00:27 26 years ago

[splinky]
Object Oriented Perl 2000-07-09 00:19 26 years ago

[splinky]
The Perl Cookbook (8/11/1)+/- 2000-07-09 00:13 26 years ago

[splinky]
- RE: A Review of the Perl Cookbook (capsule review) (1)+/- 2000-07-09 03:38 26 years ago
  
  [ybiC]
  - RE: RE: A Review of the Perl Cookbook 2000-07-09 07:10 26 years ago
    
    [splinky]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook 2001-03-21 00:38 25 years ago
  
  [wganz]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook 2001-04-20 00:42 25 years ago
  
  [dze27]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook 2001-09-27 19:01 25 years ago
  
  [Rich36]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook 2001-11-19 20:41 24 years ago
  
  [giulienk]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook (1)+/- 2002-09-04 15:48 24 years ago
  
  [/dev/null]
  - Re: Re: The Perl Cookbook 2003-09-21 10:35 23 years ago
    
    [ackme]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook 2005-07-22 20:25 21 years ago
  
  [cowhide]
- Re: The Perl Cookbook 2016-10-07 19:34 10 years ago
  
  [Phenomanan]
Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web (6/12/2)+/- 2000-07-08 00:51 26 years ago

[Ovid]
- RE: Book Review - Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web (1)+/- 2000-07-08 09:12 26 years ago
  
  [athomason]
  - RE: RE: Book Review - Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2000-07-08 22:06 26 years ago
    
    [Ovid]
- Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web [4](1)+/- 2001-02-05 19:29 25 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - (Ovid) Re(2): Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2001-02-05 20:05 25 years ago
    
    [Ovid]
- Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web (1)+/- 2001-03-26 19:19 25 years ago
  
  [davorg]
  - Re: Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2002-03-19 12:48 24 years ago
    
    [fenners]
- Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web (2/3)+/- 2001-06-09 21:34 25 years ago
  
  [Dominus]
  - Re: Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2001-06-09 22:05 25 years ago
    
    [footpad]
  - (Ovid) Re(2): Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web (1)+/- 2001-06-09 22:40 25 years ago
    
    [Ovid]
    - Re: (Ovid) Re(2): Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2001-08-06 04:46 25 years ago
      
      [astaines]
- Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2001-08-10 06:15 25 years ago
  
  [Chrisf]
- Re: Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web 2001-08-10 07:12 25 years ago
  
  [clintp]

+/-Polls (Top)

I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... (8/18/3)+/- 2000-07-06 15:59 26 years ago

[vroom]
- RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... 2000-07-06 16:07 26 years ago
  
  [Jonathan]
- (jeffa) RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... 2000-07-06 17:38 26 years ago
  
  [jeffa]
- RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... (kudra: brown Volvos are evil) 2000-07-06 17:38 26 years ago
  
  [kudra]
- I consider driving on the top of the road to be safest generally.... (1/5)+/- 2000-07-06 18:02 26 years ago
  
  [gryng]
  - RE: I consider driving on the top of the road to be safest generally.... (1/4)+/- 2000-07-07 06:28 26 years ago
    
    [nardo]
    - Type of vehicle required to drive on bottom side of the road? (1/3)+/- 2000-07-07 07:27 26 years ago
      
      [gryng]
      - RE: Type of vehicle required to drive on bottom side of the road? (1/2)+/- 2000-07-07 09:32 26 years ago
        
        [nardo]
        
        Daring Denouement (1)+/- 2000-07-07 17:59 26 years ago
        
        [gryng]
        
        RE: Daring Denumont 2000-07-07 19:04 26 years ago
        
        [Jonathan]
- RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... (1/2)+/- 2000-07-06 19:40 26 years ago
  
  [BigJoe]
  - RE: RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... (1)+/- 2000-07-08 19:01 26 years ago
    
    [Viking]
    - RE: (3) I consider driving on this side of the road... (tobaccy, car doors) 2000-07-08 20:04 26 years ago
      
      [ybiC]
- RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... 2000-07-06 23:07 26 years ago
  
  [gaggio]
- RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... [9](1/3/1)+/- 2000-07-07 14:36 26 years ago
  
  [Anonymous Monk]
  - RE: RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... (1/2/1)+/- 2000-07-08 03:21 26 years ago
    
    [mikfire]
    - RE: RE: RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... (1)+/- 2000-07-08 04:04 26 years ago
      
      [Ozymandias]
      - RE: RE: RE: RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... 2000-07-10 18:16 26 years ago
        
        [Cirollo]
- RE: I consider driving on this side of the road to be safest generally.... 2000-07-10 15:17 26 years ago
  
  [Kevman]

+/-Users (Top)

autark 2000-07-08 08:21 26 years ago