in reply to (tye)Re: Elegant way to parse an optional prefix with default?
in thread Elegant way to parse an optional prefix with default?
Interesting... this relies on undef being dropped in list catenation, so '&' becomes the first element?
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
(tye)Re2: Elegant way to parse an optional prefix with default?
by tye (Sage) on Nov 08, 2002 at 17:31 UTC |