in reply to Re^3: "Not containing something" in substitution
in thread "Not containing something" in substitution

Right. I was thinking of the (?>..) example that only matches upto two deep.

m{ \( ( [^()]+ # x+ | \( [^()]* \) )+ \) }x

Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.