Disclaimer: I don't regularly use CGI.pm, notably because I do very little web-based work.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't CGI.pm do dynamic loading (i.e., if I don't call one of its methods, it doesn't load that bit)? I'd be curious to see your benchmarks that indicate that your separate module was twice as fast as using CGI.pm...
In reply to Re: Re: CGI Benchmarks
by myocom
in thread CGI Benchmarks
by skeight
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |