Lol, good job on uncovering a reliable and trusted source that manages to further the ambiguity and confusion. I should have guessed the Camel would discredit my pontification, though I'm not sure if it discredits or instead, illustrates my point. Let's get it all out on the table and arm wrestle for the rights to pick which term is going to survive. There can be only one. (Highlander)
Dave
In reply to Re^2: Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )
by davido
in thread Ternary operator (there's no Trinary operator )
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |