in reply to Re: plz replace this super ugly & damned bad board by a supergood one: take open source [of course]
in thread plz replace this super ugly & damned bad board by a supergood one: take open source [of course]

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.
  • Comment on Re^2: plz replace this super ugly & damned bad board by a supergood one: take open source [of course]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: plz replace this super ugly & damned bad board by a supergood one: take open source [of course]
by Joost (Canon) on Aug 26, 2006 at 11:52 UTC
    i am new to the board - and i must admitn that the usabilty is not so good
    Can you elaborate a bit? I find the PM forums a lot clearer than most boards I've used, because it has threads - and message boards without threads are useless for discussions. Also, unlike devshed, it doesn't allow people to fill up screen space with useless avatars so we can all concentrate on what's being said.

    Update: I have no idea what http://Dainweb.com is, and I can't find the forums since I can't read Chinese.

      Also, unlike devshed, it doesn't allow people to fill up screen space with useless avatars so we can all concentrate on what's being said.
      I think you hit one usability feature on the head here! The basically spartan interface of Perlmonks is perhaps one of its best features. Putting statistics, rankings and avatars in the threads makes them far harder to read and follow. The content intensive design of the Monastery is one of its great features.

      jdtoronto