in reply to Re: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed)
in thread A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

So the message should be updated?

Optimising for fewest key strokes only makes sense transmitting to Pluto or beyond
  • Comment on Re^2: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed)
by LanX (Saint) on Apr 22, 2026 at 00:41 UTC
    Probably for people who are already logged in and still under level 3.

    It's jdporter's baby and he's adjusting the thresholds from time to time.

    So it's up to him his to implement this in the best way.

    Cheers Rolf
    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
    see Wikisyntax for the Monastery

      I have updated the code to show a distinct message for this scenario, i.e. where the user is logged in but the node is very bad. The text for this case is:

      A reply falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

      Thanks to hexhex for bringing this to our attention.

      Today's latest and greatest software contains tomorrow's zero day exploits.
        I'm on the train and have trouble checking but IIRC two places need to be patched.

        Furthermore would I personally include the necessary level, otherwise new requests are likely to happen again.

        I would have patched it myself, but given that there are two places to be patched i would have needed to insert two config variables for thresholds (downvotes and level) to manage it from a central point, and I don't know how to do this.

        Cheers Rolf
        (addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
        see Wikisyntax for the Monastery