in reply to Re^5: Canonization Without Representation
in thread Canonization Without Representation

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.
  • Comment on Re^6: Canonization Without Representation

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: Canonization Without Representation
by sierpinski (Chaplain) on Mar 20, 2017 at 13:39 UTC

    You seem to want to end this discussion. I respect that and appreciate the input that you had before. If you want to pursue it some other time, let me know and I will destroy your arguments easily.

    Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. It's just as impossible to convince an entitled person that they're entitled as it would be to convince the pope that there is no God. It's an exercise in futility, but if you think you could destroy any argument of mine, good for you, it would be pointless to try to convince you otherwise, but it would also be a monumental waste of my time.
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.