in reply to Re: Re: Perl vs. Python: Looking at the Code
in thread Perl vs. Python: Looking at the Code

Your honor the jury rules on the following counts.
clearer, more concise syntax
Charges not proved. Clearer != more concise sysntax. As has been mentioned many times with regard to sigils, a core perl design object was that different types of things should look different so as to reduce confusion
a shorter path to producing autogenerating documentation
Not proved. I wrote a simple but effective tool to add pod to an arbitray module class and it only took me an hour. But thats cause I used one of the most sophisticated regex engines there is: Perl.
having to only worry about, maybe, 4-5 different styles to maintain vs. 20
Not proved your honor. Complaints like this are redundant in the face of autoindenters like Emacs and PerlTidy. Does Python have a tidier?
far fewer rules to remember
Irrelevant. Try doing complicated things with simple tools and the result is convoluted.

Yves / DeMerphq
---
Writing a good benchmark isnt as easy as it might look.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Perl vs. Python: Looking at the Code