Perhaps the following quote from the Camel Book will shed some light on this question:
Short-circuit alternation is often faster than the corresponding regex. So:
print if /one-hump/ || /two/;is likely to be faster than:
print if /one-hump|two/;at least for certain values of one-hump and two. This is because the optimizer likes to hoist certain simple matching operations up into higher parts of the syntax tree and do very fast matching with a Boyer-Moore algorithm. A complicated pattern tends to defeat this.
— Tom Christiansen, brian d foy & Larry Wall with Jon Orwant, Programming Perl (4th Edition, 2012), p. 692.
Hope that helps,
| Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum | Iustus alius egestas vitae, eros Piratica, |
In reply to Re: alternation in regexes: to use or to avoid?
by Athanasius
in thread alternation in regexes: to use or to avoid?
by dk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |