It's not clear to me what you are trying to achieve with your regex.
The simple grouping that look like this
aol\s*\w+|aachen\s*\w+|aaliyah\s*\w+|.....runs quickly, it's only the one with lots of capture groups that is slow. i.e
(aol)\s*\w+|(aachen)\s*\w+|(aaliyah)\s*\w+|....So maybe there's just a better way to get the result you want, if you'd care to explain what that is?
In reply to Re: alternation in regexes: to use or to avoid?
by RichardK
in thread alternation in regexes: to use or to avoid?
by dk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |