G'day MidLifeXis,
I haven't tested any of the functionality - just had a read through the documentation. I was pleased to see links explaining the algorithm. My only criticism would be the naming of the function is_valid(): I've seen functions with this name in many pieces of code - perhaps something less generic, to avoid naming collisions, might be a better choice.
-- Ken
In reply to Re: RFC: Algorithm::Damm
by kcott
in thread RFC: Algorithm::Damm
by MidLifeXis
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |