We're descending a bit in database arcana (and not even the OPs database's), but what the hell:
Small tables don't use indexes. This 60-rows is a small table. I can't get Postgres to use an index for either 1/61 or 7/67 rows. (I even tried broadening the row with more columns, but no). Index-use only starts at a few hundred rows, for my example. A quick google search makes me think Oracle behaves the same. MySQL I'm not sufficiently interested in to go lookup; it's probably the same.
I don't see what clustered indexes have to do with the whole thing. Clustering reorganize the physical table data according to the index ordering. Obviously that can make things faster, but I rather suspect that clusteredness of an index has no bearing on plan choice.
In reply to Re^5: CGI Program To Delete Old Data From MySQL Table?
by erix
in thread CGI Program To Delete Old Data From MySQL Table?
by Milti
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |