once you have got rid of that you're left with Data::Validator which already exists :) you've entered the crowded field of validators, the best way to distinguish yourself is to compare/constrast/survey the competition
In reply to Re: Announcing Data::DynamicValidator
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Announcing Data::DynamicValidator
by basiliscos
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |