Sure, I think it's intuitive why lc('Boaty McBoat') is conceptually a "lossy" transformation (in terms of being able to restore the original string).
But NFKC("\N{VULGAR FRACTION THREE EIGHTHS}") is conceptually "lossless": there is only one Unicode character the resultant string "3\N{FRACTION SLASH}8" could be "composed" into.
As I wrote, I get now why NFKC is conceptually lossy in general. But—unlike with lc—some specific decompositions are exceptions.
In reply to Re^3: Unicode vulgar fraction composition
by raygun
in thread Unicode vulgar fraction composition
by raygun
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |