no guarantees that this won't change in the future
Indeed, just yesterday on P5P: Should we upgrade to a new PRNG in core?
And a relevant note from that thread by Russ Allbery:
The most secure option is to not use any type of pseudo-random number generator and instead rely on /dev/random. If your concern is security, you should not use rand and you should not use any other new algorithm that similarly does not use /dev/random. ... If /dev/random is available and you want random numbers for security purposes, you should just use it via Crypt::URandom, Crypt::Random, etc.
In reply to Re^2: how portable is the random number generator?
by haukex
in thread how portable is the random number generator?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |