Furthermore would I personally include the necessary level, otherwise new questions are likely to pop up again. *
I would have patched it myself, but given that there are two places to be patched i would have needed to insert two config variables for thresholds (downvotes and level) to manage it from a central point, and I don't know how to do this.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
There is some confusing code in at least 3 nodes,¹ sometimes a hardcoded level -9 is used otherwise a system wide HTMLVARS² crap_threshold = -4 . Furthermore does Annomonk have two system wide identifiers like guest- and default-user.
I'd volunteer to clean this up with 3-4 patches by adding crap_min_xp and refactoring the code to be consistent.
I'd suggest only need one clause ((guest_user or crap_min_xp) and level< crap_threshold)
°) shownote and std_node_display
*) ok I realize now that you just skipped the login advice. Another way to solve it. 👍🏻 :)
In reply to Re^5: A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in. (Acolyte Level=3 needed)
by LanX
in thread A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
by hexhex
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |