"...P::FM doesn't start the next process exactly..."
It seems so :-)
karl@host:~$ ./buk.pl 4 processes: 4 fork: 7.16779208183289 karl@host:~$ ./buk.pl 8 processes: 8 fork: 7.21501088142395 karl@host:~$ ./buk.pl 16 processes: 16 fork: 7.43911504745483 karl@host:~$ ./buk.pl 32 processes: 32 fork: 7.09555101394653 karl@host:~$ ./buk.pl 50 processes: 50 fork: 6.84368109703064 karl@host:~$ ./buk.pl 100 processes: 100 fork: 6.94914984703064 karl@host:~$ ./forker.pl 4 numbers: 2000 processes: 4 fork: 19.2249510288239 for: 33.1473791599274 karl@host:~$ ./forker.pl 50 numbers: 2000 processes: 50 fork: 19.63889503479 for: 33.3032410144806
Thank you very much and best regards, Karl
«The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»
In reply to Re^6: Useful number of childs revisited
by karlgoethebier
in thread Useful number of childs revisited [SOLVED]
by karlgoethebier
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |